If you operate from outside the U.S.Then the state is a cost decision, not a tax one.
This is the case the comparison above is really for, and it is worth saying plainly: if you have no office, no staff and no inventory in the United States, no state has income to tax you on. The «no state income tax» line that sells Wyoming and Nevada is describing a tax you were not going to pay anyway. What is left is three things that do differ.
What it costs to keep aliveEvery year, forever, whether or not the company invoiced anything. This is the number that actually separates the states.
Whether your name is publishedSome states put the members on a public register and some do not. Decide before you file: it cannot be undone afterwards.
Whether a bank recognises itOpening the account from abroad is the hard part of the whole process, and an unfamiliar state makes it harder.
Where that usually lands: Wyoming or New Mexico if the priority is the lowest possible upkeep and keeping the owners off the public record. Florida or Delaware if the account and the recognition matter more than the annual fee — Delaware specifically if you expect to take on investors. Ohio if you would rather have no annual deadline at all. Nevada is the one we rarely recommend for this case: you pay the most and, because the annual list is public, you do not even get the privacy.
And the part that does not change with the state: a U.S. LLC with a single foreign owner has to file Form 5472 with a pro-forma Form 1120 every year, including years with no activity, and the penalty for skipping it is the same in all fifty. Choosing a cheaper state does not buy you out of that.
Annual fees and reporting requirements are set by each state and change from year to year, which is why we do not print figures here: you get the current ones in your quote. What does not change is the logic above.